EHR Data interoperability: Apple, Google, CMS and FHIR

Data interoperability is the flavor of the month. Everyone is working on it.

Different EHR providers mean ‘proprietary data’ and impact to revenue hence naturally system A can’t talk to system B when patient changes health plan, provider or employer benefits

Apple may be bringing disruption with its consumer play.

Apple launched its Health Records platform with over a dozen partners.

While about 40 health systems are now primed to sharing their medical records with patients through the iPhone Health Records app is impressive, what’s particularly interesting is Apple’s bet that consumers will be empowered to share this data with an ecosystem of digital health apps (developers) on their phones and providers and drive their own insights.

This is particularly a new approach with EHR portability which is usually system led rather than consumer led.

To make this all possible, the industry had to agree to one standard – Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). This then serves as a connector to read and port data to/from from an EHR. Apple’s partners include top tier systems such as NYU langone Health, Stanford Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine and John Hopkins hospital.

While Apple is pursing a B2C play, Google continues it’s domination in B2B via acquisitions.

Google’s Apigee (acquired in 2016) has apparently been working with several healthcare companies, including Walgreens, Kaiser Permanente to build links between data streams connecting existing data sets in disparate systems and finding new ways to ingest data from other sources. It’s strategy is to build an ecosystem of developers that are native to Apigee’s API.

There isn’t much data yet on adoption except in the single payer UK NHS where Deepmind (another acquisition) and Google’s AI arm has rolled out a number of limited hospital rollouts of it’s Streams app.

With use of the Apigee API, come storage requirements. Apigee sits under Google’s relatively new Cloud division so naturally it’s aim is to sell cloud services to these organizations to catchup up to Amazon’s Web Services and Microsoft Azure.

Lastly, the government has taken a stand to accelerate interoperability. Championed by White House advisor Jared Kushner, CMS debuted blue button 2.0 in March. The premise is patients should have access to their medical data wherever they go throughout their lifetime. As such it is requiring health plans to share data on Medicare participants. CMS requirements include requiring providers to update their systems to ensure data sharing, allowing patient’s data to follow them after they are discharged from a hospital and streamlined documentation and billing for providers.

As data becomes a commodity, non differentiated EHR incumbent providers such as Epic, Allscripts, Cerner will have to revisit their business models due to competitive new entrants and reduced revenue.

Advertisements

Facebook and the healthcare sector

Considering the launch of a Bayer campaign back in 2016 reported by Fierce Pharma, Facebook has been building teams that sell pharma ads to the health care sector. While still in the early stages, it is no secret that Google built those teams years ago to sell account management and ad targeting for big pharma and life sciences firms.

Google got clever however. It long invested in Google (Cloud), one of the fastest growing business segment in enterprise. With Amazon (Web Services) and Apple (Electronic health records rollout on its devices), Facebook is far behind the GAFA set in the health care industry. The recent Cambridge Analytics data privacy breach is a set back for the company in rollout of any new enterprise platforms (Workplace by Facebook) and patient data analytics experimentation, especially considering HIPAA privacy regulations. Workplace by Facebook reportedly has signed up over 10,000 organizations in a very short time and is possibly the medium to enter the industry. By working with healthcare providers on collaboration and predictive analytics tools, it may be the route to compete in the already crowded telemedicine market.

Time will only tell if the company can build products that expand beyond other people’s data and the advertising model.